Hon. D. S. Berry was born May 13, 1858 at Sterling, Ill., graduated from Morrison public schools, studied law in the office of O. F. Woodruff, moved to Savanna May 1, 1883. Married to Mary L. Tucker, of Morrison, in 1882. Two children, Ethel and Ivy, are the result of the union. Was President of the Board of Education of the Savanna public schools for 7 years. Was City attorney of Savanna for 10 years. Was elected to the Illinois Legislature in 1890, re-elected in ‘92 and again in ‘94. In his first session he immediately became prominent as the Republican Parliamentary leader in the long and hard fought contest to repeal the compulsory education law of the state. In his second session, he was the recognized leader of the Republican side of the House, having been selected as the chairman of the Republican caucus. In his third session, he was a candidate for Speaker, but his well known record against corporations defeated him for that position, yet his legal ability made him Chairman of the Judiciary, the principal committee of the House. At this session he was again Chairman of the Republican caucus and he appointed the Steering Committee, he being the chairman of that committee. He was, also, during the session, on account of the illness of the Speaker, made Acting Speaker, and in addition to the important duties of chairman of the Judiciary and Steering Committees, performed the duties of Speaker during the most of the session.
In the interest of the farmers of the state, and at their urgent request, he took charge of and passed through the House against the opposition of the Lobby and Chicago members, the Anti-Butterine Bill. He had charge of, and passed the Bill providing for the founding of the Northern Illinois Normal School at DeKalb, Governor Altgeld, for this service, desired to appoint him one of the Trustees of that Institution, but being a member of the Gen’l Assembly, he was not eligible. Mr. Berry formulated as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, an important Bill to reform and simplify the practice and procedure in the Courts, and secured its passage in the House, but it was killed in the Senate. When the Consolidated Gas Bill, which permitted all the Gas companies of Chicago to consolidate into one enormous trust and monopoly, was before the Assembly, Mr. Berry opposed it on the ground that it was bad in principle, that it destroyed competition, that it tended to make the rich richer and the poor poorer; that it was unrepublican and contrary to the letter and spirit of a free people, and ought not be permitted, much less legalized. But the bitterest fight he had was on the Bill known as the “Race Track Bill,” which if passed would have legalized race track gambling, commonly called pool selling.
Mr. Berry absolutely refused to recognize any member to call up that bill in the House -- that required nerve. He had it, and it killed the bill; it never reached a vote. But his life was threatened 50 times on account of that act. He has said it was the best thing he ever did for the people and for his party, because, if it ever reached a vote, it would have passed and become a law, and as such would have been a disgrace not only to the Republican party but to the state. It was that contest and his action therein that brought upon the bitter hatred of that “king of liars,” that champion black-guard, H. H. Kohlsaat, of the Chicago Times-Herald. We might enumerate many other public services performed by Mr. Berry, as a legislature, but space forbids. He took a positive stand on all matters before the body of which he was a member, and his position sealed the fate of nearly every Bill. He was recognized as the ablest lawyer in the Legislature. He always voted for what he considered the best interests of his constituents and the people of the state, and he always drew the hottest fire of his opponents. He was never called a “wooden man.” At the special session he lacked only two votes of being elected Speaker. He challenges any man or any newspaper to name one vote he ever cast against the interests of his constituency, or to specify a single wrong public act of his life, or to furnish a particle of evidence thereof. The Chicago Times-Herald hounded him, abused him and deliberately and maliciously lied about him, but never furnished a scintilla of evidence against him. His many friends insist that he must again represent them in the legislature, and if “called” he will accept, they say. He is one of the most brilliant lawyers in Northern Illinois, and has been counsel in many of the greatest trials ever in our courts.