|
The State of Tennessee
In Chancery at Harrison
George O. Cate
vs Alfred M. Cate, et al
It appearing that the defendant,
Alfred M. Cate, is a non resident of the State of Tennessee, so that the
process of the court cannot be served on him, it is therefore ordered that
publication be made weekly for four weeks in the Chattanooga Rebel Newspaper
published in the city of Chattanooga, requiring said defendant to appear at a
Chancery Court to be held t the Court House in the city of Harrison, on the
second Monday of June next, and answer complaints bill, or judgment by
confession will be entered and the cause set for bearing ex parte.
Jan 29 – 4w
R. G. Jones
Clerk & M.
Chattanooga Daily Rebel – February
12, 1863
The State of Tennessee
In Chancery, at Harrison
William Caruthers
vs Alfred M. Cate and others
It appearing that the defendant,
Alfred M. Cates, has absconded from the State of Tennessee, so that the ordinary process of the court cannot be
served on him.
It is therefore ordered, that
publication be made weekly for four weeks in the Rebel, a newspaper publication
in Chattanooga, Tennessee, requiring said defendant to appear at a chancery
court to be held at the Court House in Harrison, on the second Monday of June
next, and answer complaints amended bill, or judgment pro confessed will be
entered against him, and the cause set for hearing ex parte.
Jan 14 w4t
R. Jones, C & W.
Chattanooga Daily Rebel – February
12, 1863
State of Tennessee
In Chancery at Harrison
John L. Yarnell
vs Samuel Clark, surviving partner
of Clark, McFier & Co.
In Chancery at Harrison
It appearing that the defendant
Samuel Clark, is a non resident of the State of Tennessee, so that the ordinary process of
the court cannot be served on him.
It is therefore ordered that
publication be made weekly for four weeks, in the Rebel, a newspaper published
in Chattanooga, requiring said defendant to appear at a Chancery Court to be
held at the Court House in Harrison, on the second Monday of June next, and
answer complaiant’s bill, or judgment pro confesso will be entered against him,
and the cause set for hearing, ex parte.
May 6 – w4t
R. G. Jones, Clerk & M.
Chattanooga Daily Rebel – June 13,
1863
State
of Tennessee
In
Chancery at Harrison
Peter
Monger Administrator of William Stone, Decd., Vs
the Widow, Heirs and Creditors
It
appering that the defendant Mitchell M. Stone, is
a non resident of the State of Tennessee, so that
the ordinary proces of the court cannot be served
on him, it is therefore ordered that publication
be made weekly for four weeks, in the "Reber,"
a newspaper published in Chattanooga, requiring
siad defendants to appear at a Chancery Court to
be held at the court house in Harrison, on the second
Monday of June next, and answer complainants bill,
or judgement pro confesso will be entered against
him, and the cause act for
hearing
ex parte.
R.
G. Jones
Clerk
& M
May
12 - w4t
Chattanooga
Daily Rebel - June 13, 1863
State
of Tennessee
In
Chancery at Chattanooga
Alexander
Cooper VS John Jones
It
appearing that the defendant John Jones is a non-resident
of the State of Tennessee, so that the process of
the Court cannot be served on him. It is therefore
ordered that publication be mae weekly for four
weeks in the Chattanooga Rebel, a newspaper published
in the city of Chattanooga, rquiring said defendant
to appear at a Chancery Court to be held at the
Court House in the city of Chattanooga, on the first
Monday in January next, and answer a bill filed
against him in said court by complainant, or judgement
by confession will be entered and cause set for
hearing ex parte.
Wm
Standefer Clerk & M
nov
4-4t
Chattanooga
Daily Rebel - November 4, 1862
Day's
Record in The Courts
Yesterday
was something of a strenuous day for Acting Police
Magistrate Locke.
J.
A. Starkly pair $7 and costs for drunkenness, M.
P. Harrington paid $1 and cost for the same offense.
Pete
Munson will go to jail in default of $1 and cost
to pay for his fine for inebriation.
John
Doe paid $1 and cost for disorderly conduct.
A
preliminary examination was held in the case of
Larry Smith, accused of assaulting W. H. Spangenbert
with a deadly weapon, and Justice Dunbar took the
matter under advisement. At this point it
was agreed that Smith should plead guilty to a simple
assault, and he was fined $5 and costs, amounting
to $15.00 in all.
P.
L Harper has brought suit in the district court
to collect a judgment for $788.60 from John Skillern
which was rendered by the chancery court of Hamilton
County, Tennessee, April 19, 1897. Davidson
& Stoutmeyer are attorneys for the plaintiff.
Idaho
Statesman - April 4, 1905
Hamilton’s Quota
She Dumps Much Work on the Supreme Court
A sensational Answer to a Sensational Bill for Divorce – He
is a Actor
Twenty transcripts were filed yesterday from the Chancery
Court of Hamilton County.
Transcripts from this court come in neater style than from
any other court in this division. The
causes are as follows:
Capital City Bank et ala vs. M. H. Ward, Trustee, and all
the rest of Chattanooga. Complainants
hold $17,000 paid up stock in the Hughes Lumber Company, and allege at great
length fraudulent management of the affairs of said company.
W. B. Carr vs M. M. Henderson et als. Actions for a livery stable debt.
Chattanooga Gas Light Company vs Mayor and Alermen. Action for $5,000 damages for violation of a
contract.
City Savings Bank vs M. J. O’Brien et als. Action for a $1,000 note.
D. B. Carlin appellant vs. W. C. Thatcher et al. Action for payment of a small judgment.
J. S. Stephenson, appellant, and wife vs W. J. Willingbam et
al. Action for payment of $12,000 for an
interest in a lot.
Lookout Bank of Morristown, appellant, vs. Crescent Mining
Company et al. Action to recover a
$1,000 note.
P. M. Long, appellant, vs D. J. Ellis et al. complainant, a
pauper, charges defendants of unlawfully holding property which he claims to
have inherited and seeks to dispossess them.
John P. Fuller, appellant, et al. vs Hamilton County, comes
a second time to this court for trial.
An action is to recover interest in a small piece of property.
Rast Tennessee Manufacturing, appellants, vs. W. D. Kelly,
Jr., et al. Action for $1,200 due for
lumber furnished.
William Parker vs. American Fire insurance Company,
appellants. Respondent obtained judgment
below for insurance for loss of a small house by fire.
J. D. Barnes, appellant, vs Lewis Shephard to recover
$3,823.20 loaned in 1888.
John McVey, appellant, vs. Creed F. Bates, executor, et
al. Action to debt of $500.
John Murphy vs. L. P. Hatcher et al., appellant. Action to recover a note of $1,500.
Merchant & Co. vs. E. T., V. & G., appellant. To recover value of a shipment of tin that
was never delivered, worth about $100.
Morrison Lumber Company appellant vs. Lookout Mountain Hotel
Company et als. For payment of a note of
$525.
Jno. McVay vs Creed F. Cates, administrator. Small judgment against one of the defendants,
Wagner.
M. C. Reynolds by, next friend vs Mary Wade et als.
Appellants. Trouble over land.
State of Tennessee ex rel vs. mayor and alderman et al. Trouble over small realty.
Daily Journal and Journal and Tribune – July 7, 1892
|